PR Business 1 - 0 PR Week
Posted Saturday, April 1, 2006 at 10:48pm in Blogging, PR General, Technology |
Good afternoon PR fans, you’ve just joined us following the terrific head-to-head battle between leading PR magazine, PR Week, and up-and-coming contender, PR Business, for the highly acclaimed title, Tech PR Publication Champion.
Wow, what a battle it was too and it certainly lived up to the pre-match hype. No one was sure which way this one was going to go but many critics were claiming that the leading champion (PR Week) was just too old, too stuck in its ways and wouldn’t rise to the challenge of the new, hungry opposition with a point to prove.
Let me tell you, this wasn’t the case. Both came out fighting with the long established mag, PR Week, demanding total respect from the outset. But showing no signs of intimidation, PR Business demonstrated its rough and tough ability through its much reported tech PR training regime.
Both publication warriors were up for the challenge, and a great column piece by PR Week editor, Danny Rogers titled “New media channels reach tipping point” showed that PR Week did indeed mean business. The opening sentence in the column was “We stand on the cusp of a revolution” only added to the excitement.
Now if this isn’t a pro-tech statement from PR Week then I don’t know what is. Many even thought that it could have been the decisive factor between the two, pretty much before PR Business had a chance to find its rhythm. But no, PR Business followed up with a double page spread written by Mantra PR’s Lawrence Dore, titled “The future’s bright”.
The piece delved right into tech PR from a beginner’s stance and highlighted the need for regular PR to embrace new communication channels or “sit in a dark room and wonder why no one loves them.” Perhaps, the best comment (in my opinion) is “something strange has happened: technology has become interesting, ubiquitous, and, dare I say it, downright sexy.” Damn right Mr D, I hear ya.
Oh but that’s not all. If that wasn’t enough to stagger PR Week, PR Business unleashed a killer move. Someone who’s in on the know and a frontliner of the PR blogosphere. We hear about Wikipedia, blogs, podcasts, the Guardian, MySpace and last and **certainly** least, Strumpette (no link sorry).
Looks like this was the pivotal moment in the fight, but credit where it’s due, PR Week tried to fire back with a page dedicated to tech news and another (page) recommending three online publications to target consumer gadgets to. (Which, in my opinion, missed out the majority of big players like Engadget and Gizmodo, for example.)
For the newcomer, strength and stamina certainly was in abundance as it continued to unleash a tirade of unanswered hits. Notably the “Straight talking” piece with the strapline “Why the bloggers should not be silenced.”
I’m happy to say PR Week wasn’t badly hurt - a bruised ego more than anything. In the post fight interview it said it will be back with a vengeance and also a weekly round up of best blogs - whether they are PR blogs I don’t know - we wait with anticipation. Rematch? Who knows?
Watching in the stands was a possible contender for the Tech PR Publication Champion. It goes by the name of CorpComms magazine. A new monthly magazine covering… all things corporate communications I guess? And in the spirit of transparency, like Drew B, I’ve been offered a chance to receive some back issues, so maybe there’ll be a post on it soon?
So PR fans, that’s all from us. Playing us out is Arctic Monkeys with When The Sun Goes Down. Until next time.
Related Posts
- Don't Panic Guide to social media 04.14.
- 5 reasons why it's the golden age of PR 08.14.
- Internet primary news source in five years 06.04.
- Is online PR losing its real definition? 09.11.
- Straight from the hack's mouth 02.10.
- Next post: « The importance of crisis management
- Previous post: Tip: Increase your social sphere »

7 Comments
Antony Mayfield
Monday, April 3, 2006 at 4:01am
Nice match coverage, Stephen - it was quite a week and I hope the start of a lot of strong coverage of this subject!
Richard Bailey
Monday, April 3, 2006 at 7:43am
Spot on. The midfield battle for the control of mainstream public relations now involves a mastery of technology (though this doesn’t necessarily mean working for tech clients). Yet, since this is so, why the fixation with dead trees and postage?
Simon Collister
Monday, April 3, 2006 at 8:36am
Continuing the analogy… I agree it’s 1-0 to PR Business, but it’s only half-time as far as I am concerned.
PR Business may have provided more New PR coverage but it’s only one issue in and I found some of the general PR stories a bit weak - although I appreciate it’s early days.
Don’t forget that there are other PR stories out there beyond ‘new media’… Although I’m a convert most (but not all!) of my clients aren’t (yet).
Stephen
Monday, April 3, 2006 at 9:26am
Simon I agree. There certainly are more PR stories of the non-tech kind out there. But this was a battle for the Tech PR Publication Champion (see 1st para)
The battle has been won but the war still goes on. Hah! Listen to me making it sound all dramatic.
Lewis
Monday, April 3, 2006 at 11:38am
I agree with Simon’s point on the “general PR stories”, especially with a ResponseSource that came through last week asking for …
“Comment pieces …. [that] relate to a topic that
is affecting PROs. ……we want to hear about all the issues that frustrate and fluster you. Do you work ridiculous hours? Are you fed up with being treated badly by journalists? ”
Is this really what we want to read about? Don’t we already know the “issues” of PR? And will reading about other people’s somewhat parallel lives really give us any insight into what really matters?
PRW was pages and pages of opinion - not the right format for a weekly publication at all.
Lewis
Monday, April 3, 2006 at 4:26pm
Obviously I meant “PRB” in the last sentence.
Stephen
Monday, April 3, 2006 at 11:13pm
I kinda agree with Jon Silk’s post on it.
It’s good that there is a couple of PR mags on the block. It’s healthy competition for each other and better content for us.